3

What does $\lim \limits_{\theta\to0}\dfrac{\sin(\theta)}{\theta}$ equal when $\theta$ is expressed in degrees?

I know that theta in degrees is $\frac{\pi}{180}$ theta radians, but I don't get the final answer of $0.01745$.

StubbornAtom
  • 17,052
abc
  • 31

5 Answers5

5

$$ \lim_{\theta\to0}\frac{\sin\theta^\circ}{\theta^\circ} = \lim_{\theta\to0} \frac{\sin\left( \dfrac{\pi\theta}{180}\text{ radians} \right)}{\theta} = \lim_{\eta\to0} \frac{\sin(\eta\text{ radians})}{\left( \dfrac{180\eta}{\pi} \right)} = \frac\pi{180}\lim_{\eta\to0} \frac{\sin\eta}{\eta}. $$

This is why radians are used: When radians are used then $\lim\limits_{\eta\to0} \dfrac{\sin \eta} \eta=1$.

Postscript in response to comments below:

The question is how to find \begin{align} & \lim_{\theta\to0} \frac{\text{sine of $\theta$ degrees}}\theta = \lim_{\theta\to0}\frac{\text{sine function in radians}\left(\dfrac{\pi\theta}{180}\right)} \theta \\[12pt] = {} & \frac\pi{180}\lim_{\theta\to0} \frac{\text{sine function in radians}\left(\dfrac{\pi\theta}{180}\right)} {\dfrac{\pi\theta}{180}} = \frac\pi{180}\lim_{\eta\to0} \frac{\text{sine function in radians}(\eta)}\eta. \end{align}

In other words the notation "$\sin$" means a particular function: the one that maps a number $\eta$ to the sine of $\eta$ radians.

End of postscript

It's the same as the reason why $e$ is the "natural" base for exponential functions: \begin{align} \frac{d}{dx} 2^x & = (2^x\cdot\text{constant}) \\[10pt] \frac{d}{dx} 3^x & = (3^x\cdot\text{a different consant}) \\[10pt] \frac{d}{dx} 20^x & = (20^x\cdot\text{yet another constant}) \end{align} etc. Only when the base is $e$ is the "constant" equal to $1$.

  • What I don't understand is the first equality. The original denominator is theta in degrees. So in the first equality, why is the denominator just theta but not (pi theta/180 radians)? Should we convert it to radians as well like the way we did for sin in the numerator? – abc Sep 14 '14 at 03:01
  • @abc : I've expanded the answer in response to your comment above. ${}\qquad{}$ – Michael Hardy Sep 14 '14 at 16:46
4

The questions seems to be asking you to evaluate

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin^*(x)}{x},$$

where $\sin^*$ means the usual $\sin$ function but evaluating its argument in terms of degrees.

Now, since $360^\circ = 2\pi$ radians, we have the identity

$$\sin^*(x) = \sin\left(\frac{2\pi x}{360}\right)$$

(This is worth contemplating for a bit)

Anyway, we now are trying to evaluate

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin(\frac{2\pi x}{360})}{x}$$

Applying L'Hopital, this is equal to the limit

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{2\pi}{360} \frac{\cos(\frac{2\pi x}{360})}{1} = \frac{2\pi}{360} \sim 0.01745.$$

  • 1
    I think the question is asking that if the denominator x is in degrees as well. When you write "x" as the denominator, do you mean "x" in degrees or "x" in radians? That is the part that I am the most confused about. – abc Sep 14 '14 at 03:13
  • So I think the problem is worded in an unfortunate way. You really shouldn't think of the denominator as being degrees or radians... what would it mean to divide by 5 degrees? So when I write $x$ I just mean the real number $x$. The difference comes when I want to take $sin$ of $x$. After all, it doesn't really make sense to take $sin$ of a number, but rather $sin$ of an angle. So I have to decide how to turn a real number $x$ into an angle. One way I can do that is with radians, where $\pi/2$ gets mapped to a right angle. Another way is with degrees, where $90$ gets mapped to a right angle. – Kevin Ventullo Sep 14 '14 at 07:03
3

If you know the limit in radians $$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x}$$ then the limit, with $x$ given in degrees is $$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin \frac{\pi x}{180}}{x} = \frac{\pi}{180}\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin \frac{\pi x}{180}}{\frac{\pi x}{180}}$$

user164587
  • 1,509
  • Why don't we need to convert the denominator "x" to "pi time x divided by 180" as well? – abc Sep 14 '14 at 03:16
  • 1
    Because $x$ is just a number. However, the argument of $\sin$ is considered to be in radians. If the number we have is in degrees, we must adjust it. – user164587 Sep 14 '14 at 04:05
  • In my original question (in the calculus book), "x" actually is written as "x^0c" (i.e. x is in degrees). So shouldn't I convert x^0c to x times pi/180 rad as in the numerator? – abc Sep 14 '14 at 06:07
  • No. Degrees (or radians) are dimensionless. Outside of a trigonometric function, they are just numbers. – user164587 Sep 14 '14 at 06:09
  • 1
    An alternative explanation is that if you draw the unit circle and a radius, calling $x$ the arc length of the sector thus created between the positive $x$-axis and the radius. Then, the angle in radians of the sector is $x$. Dropping a perpendicular from the point of intersection of the radius and the circle, we draw a line of length $\sin x$. If we now decide to label the same angle in degrees, we get the angle to be $\frac{180x}{\pi}$, $\textbf{but the lengths of the arc and the perpendicular are unchanged}$. – user164587 Sep 15 '14 at 00:25
0

When angles are said to be in degrees, this actually means that when applying trigonometric functions, they are interpreted as degrees. Hence in the question "$\sin(\theta)$" must be understood as $$\sin\left(\frac{\pi\theta}{180}\right)$$ where $\sin$ is the usual sine function (arguments in radians) and you are in fact computing

$$\lim_{\theta\to0}\frac{\sin\left(\dfrac{\pi\theta}{180}\right)}\theta.$$

There is no reason to convert at the denominator, division is still the ordinary division. Only the trigonometric function is "special".

-2

The question is not properly posed.

In whatever units the is angle chosen the result is the same $(=1).$

For all units (degree, radian)

$$ lim_{X \rightarrow 0}\dfrac{\sin X}{X}$$

equals unity.

You should get that answer independently when asked " how many radians are there in a degree?"

Narasimham
  • 40,495
  • In a way I agree. On the other hand, the question implies that when taking the sine, angles are interpreted as degrees. Hence, $\sin(1)/1=0.0174524...$, not $0.84147...$ –  Sep 14 '20 at 14:59
  • Evaluating a fraction when the denominator is still kept at $1$.. when argument of numerator and the denominator should together tend to zero...that to me appears as needing some correction. – Narasimham Sep 14 '20 at 19:24
  • 1
    Come on, I am not computing the limit, I am showing which sine you need to consider. –  Sep 14 '20 at 21:48