Show that: $2903^n - 803^n - 464^n + 261^n$ is divisible by $1897$ for all integers $n\geq1$ using induction.
-
Where are you stuck? – amWhy Jun 22 '14 at 15:09
-
Perhaps this helps: $1897 =7 \cdot 271$. – lhf Jun 22 '14 at 15:10
-
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/755125/how-do-i-prove-that-17n-12n-24n19n-equiv-0-pmod35 – lab bhattacharjee Aug 22 '14 at 16:39
3 Answers
(I missed out the "by induction" in the question when I wrote this answer, but I will leave it here anyway. Do feel free to have it removed.)
I remember this as a classic Olympiad problem for factorization.
We can rewrite the given expression as:
$$(2903^n - 803^n) - (464^n - 261^n)$$
Then, factorizing (using the difference of powers factorization) we get:
$$(2903 - 803)(\dots) - (464 - 261)(\dots)$$ $$= 2100\cdot(\dots) - 203(\dots)$$
which is divisible by $7$. (I've omitted the expression in the bracket, but the important thing is that they are integers)
Next, we can also rewrite the given expression as:
$$(2903^n - 464^n) - (803^n - 261^n)$$
Factorizing, we get:
$$(2903 - 464)(\dots) - (803 - 261)(\dots)$$ $$=2439\cdot(\dots) - 542\cdot(\dots)$$
which is divisible by $271$ (because $271$ divides both $2439$ and $542$).
Since both $7$ and $271$ divides the given expression, it follows that $7\cdot271 = 1897$ must also divide it.

- 14,435
-
If we use congruence arithmetic operations (vs. divisibility relations) then the arithmetical essence (innate symmetry) becomes much clearer - as I explain in my answer. – Bill Dubuque Apr 26 '23 at 18:39
Hint $ $ Exploit innate $\rm\color{#c00}{symmetry}$! $ $ Consider a simpler analogous example
$\qquad\phantom{\Rightarrow}\ \ \{ 52,\ \ \ \ 23\}\ \ \equiv\, \{2,\ \ \ 3\}\ \ \ \ {\rm mod}\,\ 10,7,\ \ $
$\qquad\Rightarrow\ \{52^n,\ \ 23^n\} \equiv \{2^n,\ \,3^n\}\,\ {\rm mod}\,\ 10,7,\ \ $ by the Congruence Power Rule
$\qquad\Rightarrow\ \ \ 52^n\!+\! 23^n\ \ \equiv \ \ 2^n\!+3^n\ \ \,{\rm mod}\,\ 10,7,\ \ $ so also $\,{\rm mod}\ 70 = {\rm lcm}(10,7)\,$ by CCRT
since addition $\,f(x,y)\, =\, x + y\ $ is $\rm\color{#c00}{symmetric}$ $\,f(x,y)= f(y,x),\ $ therefore its value depends only upon the (multi-)set $\,\{x,\,y\}.\ $ OP follows the same way:
$\qquad\!\phantom{\Rightarrow} \{2903,\, 261\}\ \equiv\ \{803,\, 464\}\,\ {\rm mod}\,\ 271,7$
$\ \ \ \Rightarrow\ \ 2903^n\!+\!261^n\equiv\, 803^n\!+\!464^n\bmod 271\cdot 7\, [ = 1897]$
Generally $ $ if a polynomial $\,f\in\Bbb Z[x,y]\,$ is $\rm\color{#c00}{symmetric}$ then as above
$\qquad\qquad\quad \{A, B\}\, \equiv\, \{a,b\}\ \ {\rm mod}\,\ m, n\,\ \Rightarrow\,\ f(A,B)\equiv f(a,b)\ \pmod{\!{\rm lcm}(m,n)}\qquad\quad$
a generalization of CCRT = constant-case optimization of CRT = Chinese Remainder Theorem, plus a generalization of the Polynomial Congruence Rule to (symmetric) bivariate polynomials.
Slightly more work yields a much more general result. Let $\,o_n(x) :=$ order of $\,x\pmod{\! n}$
Theorem $\ $ If $\,\ \color{0a0}{m\mid a\!-\!c},\,\ \color{c00}{ n \mid a\!-\!d}\ $ and $\,b\,$ is coprime to $\ m,n,\,$ then
$\qquad\qquad\ \bbox[10px,border:1px solid #c00]{m,n\mid a^k\!+b^k\!-c^k\!-d^k\!\iff o_m\!\left(\frac{d}b\right)\!,\:\!o_{n}\!\left(\frac{c}b\right)\mid k}$
Remark $\, $ Induction (on $\:\!n)\:\!$ is in fact (implicitly) used in the above - it is simply hidden - being conveniently encapsulated for reuse in the linked proof of the Congruence Power Rule (or in the generalization, in the Polynomial Congruence Rule - proved by induction on the degree $\:\!n\:\!$ of the polynomial).

- 272,048
Let
$$S_n = 2903^n - 803^n - 464^n + 261^n$$
$S_1 = 1897$ so the statement is true for $n=1$.
Assume true for n, and evaluate for (n+1):
$$S_{n+1} = 2903^{n+1} - 803^{n+1} - 464^{n+1} + 261^{n+1}= $$ $$=261\cdot S_n + 2642\cdot 2903^n - 542\cdot803^n - 203\cdot464^n$$
The first term divides by $1897$ by assumption. Let
$$T_n = 2642\cdot2903^n - 542\cdot803^n - 203\cdot464^n$$
If we can prove that $T_n$ divides by 1897 then we are done. Proceed by induction (again). $T_1 = 7140308 = 3764\cdot1897$, i.e. $T_1$ divides by 1897. Assume true for n and evaluate for (n+1).
$$T_{n+1} = 2642\cdot2903\cdot2903^n -542\cdot803\cdot803^n - 203\cdot464\cdot464^n =$$ $$=464\cdot T_n + (2903-464)\cdot2642\cdot2903^n - (803-464)\cdot542\cdot803^n$$
Again the first term by assumption divides by 1897 and let $$U_n = 6443838\cdot2903^n - 183738\cdot803^n$$
Now we just need to prove that $U_n$ divides by 1897. Proceed (yet again) by induction. $U_1 = 18558920100 = 9783300\cdot1897$. So $U_1$ divides by 1897. Assume true for n and evaluate for (n+1).
$$U_{n+1} = 6443838\cdot2903\cdot2903^n - 183738\cdot803\cdot803^n =$$ $$=803\cdot U_n +6443838\cdot(2903-803)\cdot2903^n$$
again the first term divides by 1897 (by assumption). The second term = $6443838\cdot2100\cdot2903^n = 13532059800\cdot 2903^n$ and $13532059800 = 7133400\cdot 1897$, so $U_{n+1} $ divides by 1897.
(phew !! ).

- 15,966

- 7,981
- 25
- 59
-
This amounts to constructing a constant coeff order $4$ recurrence for $,S_n,,$ see the explanation here. – Bill Dubuque Apr 26 '15 at 21:48