I think the statements (1) and (2) can only be motivated but not proved.
The introduction of differential forms by Elie Cartan was in my opinion one of the
most ingenious and fruitful ideas in mathematics of the twentieth century. The heart of the idea must be the well known chain rule (here in two dimensions):
$$\tag{A}
\frac{df(x(t),y(t))}{dt}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt}\,.
$$
Recall that a vector in $\mathbb R^2$ can be written as
$$\tag{B}
\boldsymbol{v}=v_1\boldsymbol{e}_1+v_2\boldsymbol{e}_2
$$
where $\boldsymbol{e}_i$ are the basis vectors, and $(v_1,v_2)$ the components of $\boldsymbol{v}\,.$
Since $t\mapsto (x(t),y(t))$ is a curve whose tangent vector has components $(\frac{dx}{dt},\frac{dy}{dt})$ we can write the RHS of (A) as
$$
\boldsymbol{v}(f)
$$
when we view $\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ as the basis vectors $\boldsymbol{e}_1$ and $\boldsymbol{e}_2\,$.
If we "drop" $dt$ in (A) we obtain
$$
df=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\,dy\,.
$$
which can be seen as a dual relationship between $(\frac{\partial}{\partial x},\frac{\partial}{\partial y})$ and $(dx,dy)$. More precisely,
$$\tag{C}
dx(\textstyle\frac{\partial}{\partial x})=1\,,\quad
dy(\textstyle\frac{\partial}{\partial y})=1\,,\quad
dx(\textstyle\frac{\partial}{\partial y})=0\,,\quad
dy(\textstyle\frac{\partial}{\partial x})=0\,.
$$
With $\boldsymbol{v}=v_1\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+v_2\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ this leads directly to
$$
df(\boldsymbol{v})=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}v_1+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}v_2=\boldsymbol{v}\cdot\nabla f
$$
which is the directional derivative of $f$ in the direction of $\boldsymbol{v}\,.$ The dual relationships (C) are now seen as nothing else than describing the simple fact that
- the directional derivative of
$f(x,y)=x$ in the direction of $\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ is one and zero in the direction of $\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\,,$ and so on.
I stop here because there are much better pedagogical introductions to differential forms. My favourite one is pp. 53 in the book Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler.