1

Say I have the following equality $$ \ln x = d $$ This means that $x = e^d$. However, I am questioning whether, when writing this equivalence in one go, whether to use $\Rightarrow$(implies) or $\Leftrightarrow$(iff). Would you write $$ \ln x = d \Rightarrow x = e^d $$ or $$ \ln x = d \Leftrightarrow x = e^d $$ and why -- I am of course interested in the general case with a possibly longer sequence of equivalent expressions? Where my doubt is primarily coming from is that both are correct but I have seen a couple textbooks using $\Rightarrow$ while $\Leftrightarrow$ holds..

That Guy
  • 1,309
  • 3
    Both are mathematically correct; the context will determine which one is most helpful/clear. Often using words instead of a wall of symbols is the clearest way to write. – Greg Martin May 16 '22 at 19:44
  • 1
    For some purposes , we only need one direction. Therefore sometimes, only "$\implies$" is used. – Peter May 16 '22 at 19:49

2 Answers2

1

It is true that $\ln(x) = d$ $\Leftrightarrow$ $x = e^d$.

However, usually when we teach, we often teach exponentiation before we teach logarithms. In this case, when we define logarithms as the inverse function of exponentiation, we then say

Definition. We say that $\ln(x) = d$ if $x = e^d$.

Symbolically, this definition would look like: $\ln(x) = d$ $\Leftarrow$ $x = e^d$.

Usually, when we make a definition, even though the clause that the definiendum (the thing being defined) is a shorthand for must hold if and only if the definiendum would hold, yet it is customary to only use the participle "if" rather than the precise "if and only if". For example, the proper way to make the above definition would actually be to say "We say that $\ln(x) = d$ if and only if $x=e^d$." However, due to our custom, we drop the "and only if" participle.

In my above context, if the natural logarithm was defined first before exponentiation, (for example by saying that $\ln'(x) = 1/x$ and $\ln(1) = 0$), then the exponential function could then be defined as its inverse function, so

Definition. We say that $x = e^d$ if $\ln(x) = d$.

Symbolically, $x= e^d$ $\Rightarrow$ $\ln(x) = d$, or equivalently, $\ln(x) = d \implies x = e^d$.

0

While is correct in the given example, frequently—due to the additional time and cognitive load required to verify the direction—it is easy to overlook the fact that is correct but is actually not.

If there is no particular need to indicate the direction, similarly makes for a smoother reading experience than .

When solving equations, has an advantage over in assuring us that the solution set and candidate solution set are the same, but even so, using as the default symbol can be prone to autopilot carelessness and not noticing extraneous solutions.

For example, in the quoted solution here, it may feel natural to insert between every step, and be easy to miss that is actually incorrect for step $(\#).$

ryang
  • 38,879
  • 14
  • 81
  • 179