Hint: to rationalize the denominator of $\,a/b\,$ we seek a $\rm\color{#90f}{nonzero}$ rational multiple $\,bc\,$ of the denominator, then $\,a/b = ac/(bc).$ To obtain this multiple we use a norm (multiple) map to eliminate radicals one-at-time till we reach a rational. Namely, apply the Theorem below with $S = R_n := \Bbb Q[\sqrt r_1,\cdots \sqrt r_n],\ R_0 := \Bbb Q,\,$ $\, r_k\in R_{k-1}\backslash R_{k-1}^2;\: $ height $h(s)= $ least $k$ with $\,s\in R_k,\,$ i.e. index of the largest indexed radical occurring in $\,s,\,$ so height $0$ are in $\Bbb Q,\,$ height $1$ are in $R_1\backslash \Bbb Q$, height $2$ are in $R_2\backslash R_1,\,$ etc. To get a simpler (lower height) multiple take the $\color{#c00}{{\rm norm} = s\bar s}$ as below
$$h(s) = k\Rightarrow s \in R_k,\, s\not\in R_{k-1},\,\ {\rm so}\ \ s = a+b\sqrt r_k,\, a,b\in R_{k-1},\, b\neq 0,\ \,\rm so\qquad $$
$$ \color{#c00}{s\bar s} = (a+b\sqrt r_k)(a-b\sqrt r_k) = a^2- b^2 r_k \in R_{k-1}\Rightarrow h(s\bar s) \le k-1 < k\qquad$$
Theorem (Simpler Multiples) $ $ Suppose $S$ is a monoid, i.e. a set of numbers containing $\color{darkorange}1$ and $\rm\color{#0a0}{closed\ under\ associative\ multiplication}$, with height map $\,h:S\to \Bbb N.\,$ If all $s\in S$ of height $> 0$ have simpler (lower height) multiples in $S$ then all elements have a multiple with height $= 0$.
Proof $ $ By complete induction on height. Base case: $ $ if $\,h(s) = 0$ then $s = s\cdot \color{darkorange}1$ is a zero-height multiple of $\,s.\,$ Else $\,h(s) > 1.\,$ By hypothesis there is $\,t\in S$ such that $\,h(st) < h(s) \,$ so by induction there is $u \in S$ such that $h(stu) = 0,\,$ i.e. $\,s(tu)\,$ is zero-height multiple of $\,s\,$ (note $s,t,u\in S\Rightarrow st,tu,stu\in S$ by $\rm\color{#0a0}{closure\ and\ associativity}$).
Beware $ $ We need a $\rm\color{#90f}{nonzero}$ rational multiple of the denominator when using the above to rationalize denominators. To ensure that above we need to know that the norm map is nonzero for nonzero elements, and for that it suffices that $\, r_k\not\in R_{k-1}^2,\,$ i.e $\,x^2-r_k\,$ is irreducible over $R_{k-1}$. Indeed, if $\,0 = s\bar s = a^2-b^2r_k\,$ then $\,r_k = (a/b)^2\in R_{k-1}^2\,$ contra hypothesis.