3

Fourteen years ago, in 1999 (has it been that long?) Merignac started a search for,

$$x_1^6+x_2^6+x_3^6+\dots+x_7^6 = \color{red}z^6$$

with the hope that one $x_i =0 $ using the five congruence classes,

$$\begin{aligned} &42^6(x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_5^6)+(42x_6)^6+(1x_7)^6 = z^6\\ &42^6(x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_5^6)+(21x_6)^6+(2x_7)^6 = z^6\\ &42^6(x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_5^6)+(14x_6)^6+(3x_7)^6 = z^6\\ &42^6(x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_5^6)+\,(7x_6)^6\,+\,(6x_7)^6 = z^6\\ &42^6(x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_4^6)+(21x_5)^6+(14x_6)^6+(6x_7)^6 = z^6 \end{aligned}$$

So the first six $x_i$ are multiples of $7$, and primitive integer solutions are known for all five classes. The smallest known (found around 2000) by Meyrignac and Wannes de Smedt belongs to the 4th class,

$$42^6(195^6 + 260^6 + 440^6 + 506^6 + 580^6) + (7\times2747)^6 + (6\times5559)^6 = 34781^6$$

But it seems none has one $x_i = 0$ for $\color{red}z<730000$. (See Further work section of 2002 paper The Smallest Solutions to the Diophantine Equation $a^6+b^6+c^6+d^6+e^6=x^6+y^6$.)

To compare to 4th powers, one can primitively solve,

$$a^4(x_1^4+x_2^4+x_3^4)+x_4^4 = z^4$$

for $a=10$ or $a=20$ with the smallest being,

$$10^4(24^4+34^4+43^4)+599^4 = 651^4$$ $$20^4(19^4+83^4+94^4)+4907^4 = 4949^4$$

Question: Is $b=42$ overly restrictive? Can it be reduced to just $b = 21$? (As the fourth power example shows, $a = 10$ has a smaller solution. If so, maybe they overshot a solution in the $z<730000$ range?)

1 Answers1

1

The restriction to $b = 42$ is correct because any solution of the Diophantine equation

$$x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_6^6 = z^6$$

would have to meet constraints associated with each of the prime factors of 42:

a) If $a \not\equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ then $a^6 \equiv 1 \pmod{8}$;

b) If $a \not\equiv 0 \pmod{3}$ then $a^6 \equiv 1 \pmod{9}$;

c) If $a \not\equiv 0 \pmod{7}$ then $a^6 \equiv 1 \pmod{7}$.

(These can be found on this page of Meyrignac's website, albeit applied to a different 6th power equation.) To meet these constraints, a (primitive) solution must have $x_i \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ for 5 of the 6 left hand terms, and similarly for mod 3 and mod 7. Hence a solution must have $x_i^6 \equiv 0 \pmod{42}$ for at least 3 of the 6 left hand terms.

There is also a restriction associated with 13 arising from the fact that:

d) If $a \not\equiv 0 \pmod{13}$ then $a^6 \equiv 1$ or $-1 \pmod{13}$.

This implies that a solution must have an odd number of terms (which could include $z$) congruent to 0 mod 13 and, among the remaining terms, an appropriate balance of sixth powers congruent to 1 and to -1 mod 13. To combine this restriction with those relating to 2, 3 and 7 would be quite tedious but it can be said that the five congruence classes are not restrictive enough to exclude all cases which are impossible for reasons of congruence.

Adam Bailey
  • 4,197
  • Thanks. I knew that for $x_1^k+x_2^k+\dots+x_k^k = y^k$ where $k+1=p$ is prime, then one must use a congruence involving $p$. I was trying to compare $k = 4,6$ but I guess the situation is different for $k=4$ since it has only one distinct prime factor. – Tito Piezas III May 29 '13 at 18:13
  • You may be interested in this question on $x_1^6+x_2^6+\dots+x_5^6 = y^6$. – Tito Piezas III May 10 '15 at 03:17