The wikipedia page on the laws of thought mentions the The three traditional laws: The Law of the Excluded Middle, Law of Non-contradiction and The Law of Identity. These laws are accepted and used by the vast majority of mathematicians, but not by all.
Intuitionists reject the Law of the Excluded Middle, as it opens the possibility for non-constructive proofs. As such, they may prefer to use some form of intuitionistic logic, where the law is not a tautology.
Dialethics reject the Law of Non-contradiction, on the philosophical standpoint that some statements are contradictory by nature. As such, they may prefer to use some form of paraconsistent logic, where the law is not a tautology.
What about the Law of Identity?
This question is two fold:
- Is there a philosophical school that rejects the law of identity as a law of thought?
- Is there system of logic in which the law of identity is not a tautology?