I know that the field of real numbers is the only complete, ordered field in the sense that any field satisfying these properties is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{R},+,\cdot,<)$.
Question 1. Is it true that any complete, ordered Abelian group is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{R},+,<)$? If not, is there an example of a complete, ordered Abelian group $(G,+,<)$ which is not isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$?
I am using the following definition of complete: A partially ordered set $(P,\leq)$ is complete if each subset $E\subseteq P$ which is bounded above has a least upper bound in $P$. This is modeled after the completeness axiom for $\mathbb{R}$, but I can't find a good source for this more general definition.
Edit 1. It is false. A counterexample is $\mathbb{Z}$. It is complete since any subset has a maximum, and ordered as usual, but not isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$.
Question 2. What if we require $G$ to be "dense" in the following sense?
$$\forall a,b\in G, \quad \{g\in G\mid a<g<b\}\neq\emptyset$$
Does this additional condition imply $G$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$?
Edit 2. It is true. It was shown the only complete ordered Abelian groups are $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{R}$, and the "dense" condition leaves only $\mathbb{R}$.