17

So the standard Cantor set has an outer measure equal to $0$, but how can you construct a "fat" Cantor set with a positive outer measure? I was told that it is even possible to produce one with an outer measure of $1$. I don't see how changing the size of the "chuck" taken out will change the value of the outer measure. Regardless of the size, I feel like it will inevitably reach a value of $0$ as well...

Are there other constraints that need to be made in order to accomplish this?

Bach
  • 5,730
  • 2
  • 20
  • 41
Frank
  • 179

2 Answers2

19

Say you delete the middle third.

Then delete two intervals the sum of whose lengths is $1/6$ from the two remaining intervals.

Then delete intervals the sum of whose lengths is $1/12$, one from each of the four remaining intervals.

And so on. The amount you delete is $\displaystyle\frac13+\frac16+\frac{1}{12}+\cdots= \frac23.$ That is less than the whole measure of the interval $[0,1]$ from which you're deleting things.

2

The measure of a Cantor set cannot be 1, but certainly can be arbitrary close to it. Let the total measure of the pieces removed at step $n$ be equal $m_n$, so we remove an open intervalof length $m_1$ in the first step, then remove two open intervals of total length $m_2$ from the two pieces remaining after step 1. Then remove four open intervals of total length $m_3$ from the remaining four pieces left after step 2. Continuing this way, we remove open intervals with total measure $M=m_1+m_2+...$. The measure of the compact set $C$ left is $1-M$. If $M=1$, the measure of $C$ is $0$, if $M<1$ then the measure of $C$ is positive---it is fat.