Let $f_k(x)= 1-\frac {x^2} k +\frac {x^4}{2!k(k+1)}-\frac {x^6}{3!k(k+1)(k+2)}+...$
,$\forall x\in \mathbb R, k\notin \{0,-1,-2,-3,...\}$Claim: For each $x\in \mathbb R , \quad \lim_{k\to+\infty}f_k(x)=1.$
Proof:In fact, the sequence ${x^{2n}\over n!}$ is bounded (since it converges to $0$) and if C is an upper bound and if $k\gt 1$ then
$\bigl|f_k(x)-1\bigr|\leqslant\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac C{k^n}=C\frac{1/k}{1-1/k}=\frac C{k-1}.$
In this proof, the convergence of the sequence ${x^{2n}\over n!} $ is used. But in $f_k(x)$ there is the sequence $(-1)^n{x^{2n}\over n!}$
And I know since $\sum_{n=0}^\infty {x^{2n}\over n!} =e^{x^2}$ i.e this series converges, the sequence ${x^{2n}\over n!}$ must tend to $0$. But the sequence in $f_k(x) $ is $(-1)^n {x^{2n}\over n!}$ so doesn't this change anything? How does this imply that $\lim_{k\to+\infty}f_k(x)=1?$ I mean intuitively I see that as $k\rightarrow \infty $ limit of $f_k(x)$ goes to 1, but how is it proved by using the fact that the sequence ${x^{2n}\over n!}$ converges to $0?$ Do I misinterpret something ? May someone explain the process of thinking made in the proof ?