Suppose you need to solve
$$a_1x_1 + a_2x_2 + a_3x_3 = c\qquad (1)$$
in integers.
I claim this is equivalent to solving
$$\gcd(a_1,a_2)y + a_3x_3 = c\qquad (2)$$
in integers.
To see this, note that any solution to (1) produces a solution to (2): letting $g=\gcd(a_1,a_2)$, we can write $a_1 = gk_1$, $a_2=gk_2$, so then we have:
$$c = a_1x_1 + a_2x_2 + a_3x_3 = g(k_1x_1) + g(k_2x_2) + a_3x_3 = g(k_1x_1+k_2x_2) + a_3x_3,$$
solving (2). Conversely, suppose you have a solution to (2). Since we can find $r$ and $s$ such that $g=ra_1+sa_2$, we have
$$c = gy+a_3x_3 = (ra_1+sa_2)y +a_3x_3 = a_1(ry) + a_2(sy) + a_3x_3,$$
yielding a solution to (1).
This should tell you how to solve the general case
$$a_1x_1+\cdots+a_nx_n = c$$
in terms of $\gcd(a_1,\ldots,a_n)$, which can in turn be computed recursively.