8

Prove that every topological space can be realized as the quotient of some Hausdorff space.

I tried to show this by using the intersection of two open sets in $x$ (for $f:z\to x$).

Eric Wofsey
  • 330,363
user297564
  • 1,661
  • 3
    There is a 1956 paper proving this. In this answer, I suggested that one can prove this by embedding into a Boolean algebra (perhaps using some free construction), and Eric Wofsey gave another (possibly isomorphic) proof suggestion. No explicit proofs, but some good ideas I think. – Andrew Dudzik Dec 10 '15 at 16:50

3 Answers3

5

(Note: This construction is not mine; it is a slight modification of Brian M. Scott's deleted answer, which is in turn a variation on Shimrat (1956) as linked by Slade.)

The key step is the following lemma:

For any set $X$, there is a Hausdorff space $Y=\bigcup_{x\in X} Y_x$ such that the $Y_x$ are disjoint from each other and dense in $Y$.

Proof: Brian's original answer used the set $Y=X^\Bbb N$ with $Y_x=\{f\in Y\mid \exists n\in\Bbb N:f(n)=x\}$, but these sets are not disjoint. Instead, we can take any Hausdorff resolvable space $Z=A\sqcup B$ where $A,B$ are each dense in $Z$ (for example $Z=\Bbb R$, $A=\Bbb Q$, $B=\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb Q$), and set $$Y_x=\{f:X\to Z\mid f(x)\in A\land\forall y\ne x: f(y)\in B\}.$$

These are disjoint because $A$ and $B$ are, and each $Y_x$ is dense in $Z^X$ because any nonempty open set of $Z^X$ contains some $\prod_{y\in X}U_y$ where the $U_y$ are all nonempty open in $Z$; then picking $a_y\in U_y\cap A$ and $b_y\in U_y\cap B$ the function $f(y)=\begin{cases}a_y&x=y\\b_y&x\ne y\end{cases}$ is in $\prod_{y\in X}U_y\cap Y_x$. (Only finitely many choices need be made, since there are only finitely many distinct $U_y$ - most of them are equal to $Z$.) The product is Hausdorff because it is a product of Hausdorff spaces.

Now we turn to the main theorem:

For any topological space $X$ there is a Hausdorff space $\hat X$ and a quotient map $\pi:\hat X\to X$.

Take $Y$ from the lemma, using the set $X$ treated as a discrete set, and set $\hat X=\bigcup_{x\in X}\{x\}\times Y_x$ and $\pi(x,y)=x$. Since $\hat X$ is a subspace of $X\times Y$, and $\pi$ is a restriction of the left projection function, it is continuous. $\hat X$ is also Hausdorff because for any $(x,y)\ne (x',y')$, if $y=y'\in Y_x\cap Y_{x'}$ then $x=x'$, a contradiction, so $y\ne y'$ and we can choose $y\in U, y'\in U'$ with $U\cap U'=\emptyset$ and use the sets $(X\times U)\cap\hat X$, $(X\times U')\cap\hat X$.

To show that $\pi$ is open, take a basis element for the topology of $\hat X$, that is, a set of the form $T=(U\times V)\cap\hat X$ where $U\subseteq X, V\subseteq Y$ open. Then $\pi[T]\subseteq U$, and I claim that $\pi[T]=U$ so that $\pi[T]$ is open. Given $x\in U$, since $Y_x$ is dense in $Y$ there is a $y\in Y_x\cap V$, thus $(x,y)\in (U\times V)\cap\hat X=T$ and $\pi(x,y)=x\in\pi[T]$.

  • I'm not sure you are able to regard $X$ as a discrete set. You're $X$ is already a topological set, you don't need to define any other topology on $X$. – Dog_69 Feb 07 '19 at 16:33
  • @Dog_69 The first line could be worded better, but the idea is that in the lemma we need a set $X$ and we use the underlying set of the topological space $X$, without regard to its topology. The rest of the argument uses $X$ with its natural topology; in particular $\hat X$ is topologized as a subset of $X\times Y$. This is why $\pi:\hat X\to X$ is continuous into $X$ with the given topology. – Mario Carneiro Feb 07 '19 at 20:53
  • Yes I know. I think the best way to write that is as in the original paper: $$\hat X={(x,y)\in X\times Y : y\in Y_x}.$$ – Dog_69 Feb 07 '19 at 21:12
3

Corrected version.

Let $\langle X,\tau\rangle$ be any infinite space. For each $x\in X$ let $D_x$ be a copy of the discrete two-point space $\{0,1\}$, and let $Y=\prod_{x\in X}D_x$. Let $\kappa=|X|$.

  • Show that $Y$ has a base of cardinality $\kappa$.
  • Show that each non-empty open set in $Y$ has cardinality $2^\kappa>\kappa$.

Let $X=\{x_\eta:\eta<\kappa\}$ and $\kappa\times\kappa=\{\langle\alpha_\xi,\beta_\xi\rangle:\xi<\kappa\}$, and let $\mathscr{B}=\{B_\xi:\xi<\kappa\}$ be a base for $Y$ of cardinality $\kappa$. Suppose that $\eta<\kappa$, and we’ve chosen distinct points $y_\xi\in Y$ for $\xi<\eta$ such that $y_\xi\in B_{\alpha_\xi}$. Then $B_{\alpha_\eta}\setminus\{y_\xi:\xi<\eta\}\ne\varnothing$, so we may choose $y_\eta\in B_{\alpha_\eta}\setminus\{y_\xi:\xi<\eta\}$. This recursive construction gives us a family $\{y_\xi:\xi<\kappa\}$ of distinct points of $Y$ such that $y_\xi\in B_{\alpha_\xi}$ for each $\xi<\kappa$. For each $\eta<\kappa$ let

$$Y_\eta=\{y_\xi:\beta_\xi=\eta\}\;.$$

  • Show that each $Y_\eta$ is dense in $Y$, and that the sets $Y_\eta$ are pairwise disjoint.

Let $\hat Y=\bigcup_{\eta<\kappa}Y_\eta$, let $Z$ be the product of $\langle X,\tau\rangle$ and $\hat Y$, and let $\hat X=\{\langle x_\eta,y\rangle\in Z:y\in Y_\eta\}$.

  • Show that $\hat X$ is Hausdorff; the pairwise disjointness of the sets $Y_\eta$ is critical here.

Now let $\pi_X:\hat X\to X:\langle x,y\rangle\mapsto x$ be the projection; $\pi_X$ is automatically continuous and open.

  • Show that $\pi_X$ is a surjection, so that $X$ is a quotient of $Z$. (This is where you use the fact that each $Y_\eta$ is dense in $Y$ and hence in $\hat Y$.)
Brian M. Scott
  • 616,228
  • Do you have a "big picture" interpretation of this construction? – Mario Carneiro Dec 10 '15 at 16:35
  • @Mario: It was actually wrong before. I’ve fixed it and added some comments that help explain what’s going on: making the sets $Y_\eta$ pairwise disjoint allows $Z$ to be Hausdorff, because points with different $X$ coordinates can be separated on the other coordinate. – Brian M. Scott Dec 10 '15 at 17:28
  • Well, it looks like you've changed your construction considerably, so I don't feel as bad having written up my modification of your first version with my own comments. The new proof looks like it needs some serious choice though. – Mario Carneiro Dec 10 '15 at 17:46
  • @Mario: It does, but I take choice (e.g., the Tikhonov theorem) for granted. – Brian M. Scott Dec 10 '15 at 17:50
  • I'm not sure I'm at a level at which I can understand this answer. Does the Hausdorff space corresponding to the cofinite topology on $\Bbb Z$ have a simple description? – Akiva Weinberger Dec 10 '15 at 19:10
  • @Akiva: There are lots that will work. Are you willing to accept that it’s possible to find pairwise disjoint dense subsets $D_n$ of $\Bbb R$ for $n\in\Bbb Z$? – Brian M. Scott Dec 10 '15 at 19:14
  • That needs choice? I'd expect there's some construction involving decimal expansions… – Akiva Weinberger Dec 10 '15 at 19:17
  • @Akiva: No, you don’t need choice for that. One way is to let $P$ be the set of primes, index it as $P={p_n:n\in\Bbb Z}$ (which can be done without choice), and let $D_n=\Bbb Q+\sqrt{p_n}={q+\sqrt{p_n}:q\in\Bbb Q}$ for each $n\in\Bbb Z$. The sets $D_n$ are then dense in $\Bbb R$ and pairwise disjoint. – Brian M. Scott Dec 10 '15 at 19:18
  • @Akiva: Sorry: I left out the square root signs that were in my head. – Brian M. Scott Dec 10 '15 at 19:21
3

Let me elaborate on the comment of mine that Slade mentioned above. Using convergence of ultrafilters, there is a very conceptually simple way to do this. First, let us suppose $X$ is a $T_1$ space. Then the topology on $X$ is completely determined by the convergence of nonprincipal ultrafilters on $X$: for each nonprincipal ultrafilter $F$ on $X$, there is some subset $L(F)\subseteq X$ of points that $F$ converges to, and the topology on $X$ is the finest topology such that $F$ converges to $x$ for each $F$ and each $x\in L(F)$. Given a nonprincipal ultrafilter $F$ on $X$ and a point $x\in X$, we can let $X_{F,x}$ be $X$ equipped with the finest topology for which $F$ converges to $x$. Explicitly, every point in $X_{F,x}$ is open except $x$, and the neighborhoods of $x$ are the sets in $F$. Since $F$ is nonprincipal, this topology is Hausdorff. We can form the disjoint union $Y=\bigsqcup X_{F,x}$ where $(F,x)$ ranges over all pairs of a nonprincipal ultrafilter $F$ and a point $x\in L(F)$. There is then a canonical continuous map $p:Y\to X$ which is the identity map on each $X_{F,x}$. Since $p$ is continuous with respect to a topology on $X$ iff $F$ converges to $x$ for each $(F,x)$, we conclude that the given topology on $X$ is the finest topology that makes $p$ continuous. That is, $p$ is a quotient map.

What can we do if $X$ is not $T_1$? Well, we just have to detect the convergence of principal ultrafilters as well. For instance, for every pair $(x,y)\in X\times X$ such that the principal ultrafilter at $x$ converges to $y$, we could take the space $\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}$ and map each element of $\mathbb{N}$ to $x$ and $\infty$ to $y$. This map is continuous with respect to a topology on $X$ iff the principal ultrafilter at $x$ converges to $y$. So we can let $Z$ be the disjoint union of the $Y$ constructed above and a copy of $\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}$ for each such $(x,y)$, and define a map $q:Z\to X$ as the joining of of $p$ and the maps defined above. Then by a similar argument as in the $T_1$ case, $q$ is a quotient map.

Let me further remark that the space $Y$ used here is not just Hausdorff but normal. It suffices to check that each $X_{F,x}$ is normal. But this is trivial: given two disjoint closed sets, one of them does not contain $x$, and so is clopen.

(Note that the use of ultrafilters (and thus of the axiom of choice) can be eliminated by using all convergent filters containing the cofinite filter, rather than just nonprincipal ultrafilters. In fact, it suffices to just consider for each point $x\in X$ the pair $(F,x)$, where $F$ is the filter generated by the neighborhoods of $x$ and the cofinite sets.)

Eric Wofsey
  • 330,363