My calc professor once taught us a fallacious proof. I'm hoping someone here can help me remember it.
Here's what I know about it:
- The end result was some variation of 0=1 or 1=2.
- It involved (indefinite?) integrals.
- It was simple enough for Calc II students to grasp.
- The (primary?) fallacy was that the arbitrary constants (+ C) were omitted after integration.
I'm not certain, but I have a strong hunch it involved a basic trigonometric identity.