13

Which star or planet in our night sky can match what Neptune would look like when viewed from Uranus, or one of its moons?

The answer would be for the most favourable condition, which is when Neptune and Uranus are closest to each other.

Constantthin
  • 575
  • 5
  • 18
  • 4
    Neptune would need to be near opposition for it to be visible, because otherwise the Uranus–Neptune distance quickly becomes even greater than the average Earth–Neptune distance. – Pierre Paquette Oct 31 '21 at 02:47
  • 2
    The answer would be for the most favourable conditions. – Constantthin Oct 31 '21 at 02:49
  • I was amused by the implied assumption that Uranusites have eyes! Science tells us many things, but I don't seem to recall it telling us that... :-) – Ed999 Nov 01 '21 at 04:01
  • That’s why I added “or one of its moons” mate. – Constantthin Nov 01 '21 at 22:51
  • 1
    it looks like your title doesn't match what's written in the body of the question, and both of us answered the question in the title. – uhoh Nov 04 '21 at 10:51
  • 1
    @uhoh. Your answers are ok. Just want to hear some other people’s views. I am not very knowledgeable in astronomy so I can’t judge too well about this stuff. Also thought that it ought to have more answers to better reflect the vast number of views it attracted. – Constantthin Nov 04 '21 at 12:11
  • How many more answers do you want? @uhoh and I answered in a very detailed, scientific, clear, and precise way. I think either one of us (or, best, both!) deserve the bounty… – Pierre Paquette Nov 10 '21 at 00:51
  • Also @ProfRob’s answer is nice, clear, detailed, scientific, and worthy of the bounty… – Pierre Paquette Nov 10 '21 at 00:56
  • 2
    @PierrePaquette In Stack Exchange anybody can add a bounty to any question the like for any reason, without having to face The Spanish Inquisition https://youtu.be/Cj8n4MfhjUc?t=30 and only the OP decides which answer they would like to accept or not accept. For the rest of us, we have up and down votes, of which I already see fifty on the page. I think all is well. – uhoh Nov 10 '21 at 02:03

4 Answers4

20

According to https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.01973.pdf, the magnitude of Neptune follows the relationship (formula 17, page 25):

$ V = 5 \log_{10} (rd) - 7.00 + 7.944 \times 10^{-3} α + 9.617 \times 10^{-5} α^2 $

Where r is the distance of Neptune to the Sun, d is the distance of Neptune to the observer, and α is “the arc between the Sun and the sensor with its vertex at the planetocenter.” (In other words, the angle between the Sun and the observer as seen from Neptune.)

Uranus’ average distance to the Sun is 19.1 au and that of Neptune is 30.07 au. Let’s neglect eccentricities and orbital inclinations, and we get a minimum distance of about 10 au. Let’s suppose we’re directly in line with the Sun and Neptune, so the angle α is 0 (zero).

We then get

$ \begin{align} V &= 5 \log_{10} (30 \times 10) - 7 \\ & = 5 \log_{10} (300) - 7 \\ & = 5 \times 2.47712… - 7 \\ & = 12.3856… - 7 \\ & = 5.3856… \end{align} $

In other words, this is barely brighter than the faintest stars you can see with the naked eye from the Earth on a dark, moonless night, away from city lights.

But, again, this is neglecting eccentricities and orbital inclinations, so in reality, Neptune would be fainter even in the best circumstances.

Glorfindel
  • 4,790
  • 3
  • 25
  • 40
Pierre Paquette
  • 7,482
  • 20
  • 52
  • 4
    So in other words, Neptune would look from Uranus what Uranus would look from earth if one managed to spot it under the best conditions? – Constantthin Oct 31 '21 at 04:30
  • 1
    Basically, yes. – Pierre Paquette Oct 31 '21 at 07:59
  • 5
    FWIW, Uranus & Neptune have a synodic period of 62,621 days (171.45 Julian years). They had a close approach of ~10.570 au on 1994-May-07 (jd 2449480). The next one is slightly closer: 10.307 au on 2165-Dec-03 (jd 2512146.5). – PM 2Ring Oct 31 '21 at 12:58
  • 1
    It's important to note that this formula assumes small $\alpha$, which is always given from Earth but not at all true, in general, from Uranus. – leftaroundabout Nov 01 '21 at 11:30
  • @leftaroundabout: Agreed, but when $ \alpha $ is high enough to make a difference, the Uranus–Neptune distance is greatly increased, erasing all increase from $ \alpha $. – Pierre Paquette Nov 02 '21 at 03:31
  • What does the 5 in “5Log10” stand for, please? – Constantthin Nov 08 '21 at 23:27
  • For the number 5, simply. So it’s (five times the decimal log of 300) minus 7. – Pierre Paquette Nov 09 '21 at 01:19
  • What is the number 7 the value of? Is it Neptune's absolute magnitude? – Constantthin Nov 10 '21 at 05:13
  • The answer is in the document I linked, page 5: MINUS 7 “is the magnitude when observed at [a phase angle of] 0[°] and when the planet is at a distance of one au from both the Sun and the observer.” This is the definition of “absolute magnitude” in a planetary context, so yes, MINUS 7 is Neptune’s absolute magnitude (not +7). – Pierre Paquette Nov 11 '21 at 05:00
  • 2
    You get the bounty and the tick for supplying the short and concise right formula: 5LOG(rd)-M – Constantthin Nov 11 '21 at 08:56
  • Thank you very much. I’m always happy to help! – Pierre Paquette Nov 12 '21 at 00:49
  • The phase angle is the angle Sun–planet–Earth. If the Earth is exactly in line with the other two bodies, the phase angle is zero, as the Sun–planet line and the planet–Earth line are basically the same. – Pierre Paquette Nov 14 '21 at 18:26
14

Supplementary answer supporting @PierrePaquette thorough and well-source answer:

I tried the nice new JPL Horizons interface and fired up Excel which I haven't used in a long time.

For years 1800 to 2100 in Observer mode it calculates apparent magnitude using all the bells and whistles (albedo model, phase angle, illumination, etc.) and gives the following results.

Seen from Uranus, Neptune's apparent magnitude is predicted to brighten to +5.5 at opposition at a distance of about 10.5 AU.

There does seem to be a little glitch at the year 2000 (reporting it now) and as @PierrePaquette points out since the orbits are not circular if we go far into the future or past we can probably find oppositions at slightly closer distances (as low as 9.7 AU) which might bump you to +5.3

JPL Horizons, Neptune seen from Uranus

JPL Horizons, Neptune seen from Uranus

JPL Horizons, Neptune seen from Uranus

uhoh
  • 31,151
  • 9
  • 89
  • 293
  • The magnitude increase near the year 2000 is not a glitch. Neptune’s brightness has increased approaching the turn of the century. I don’t have more details, but I’m willing to look into it. – Pierre Paquette Oct 31 '21 at 23:44
  • 5
    Ha! Turns out, you, @uhoh, have asked a question about this brightness increase (see https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/37206/how-fast-is-neptune-getting-brighter-when-was-was-this-first-noticed-and-report).

    Also, the source I quoted mentions a formula change for calculating the brightness of Neptune after the year 2000, so that would explain the “glitch.” On page 23, it says: “the new analysis in this paper of both V and y magnitudes […] models Neptunian magnitudes separately for the pre-1980, 1980-2000, and post 2000 time periods.”

    – Pierre Paquette Oct 31 '21 at 23:51
  • 2
    @PierrePaquette oh that's great! Thank you for your speedy and informative comment! Luckily it came before I'd hit "send" on my email to JPL :-) – uhoh Oct 31 '21 at 23:58
  • @PierrePaquette. Global warming? – Mad Physicist Nov 01 '21 at 03:49
  • Since you have this set up already, I'd be curious to ask as a follow-up: Which planet, viewed from which other planet, at the closest possible positions in their orbits, would appear the largest? I'm thinking Venus from Mercury just by distance, but Jupiter from Mars might be a contender just given how large it is? – Darrel Hoffman Nov 01 '21 at 17:10
  • @DarrelHoffman the way I did it I'd have to repeat this $N \times (N-1)$ times so I won't. There's easier ways. If you ask that as a new question I or someone else can answer it. – uhoh Nov 01 '21 at 20:33
  • You'd really only need to test each adjacent pair, from the smaller of the two. Any other combination would definitionally be smaller, but I've made another question if you want to try it there. – Darrel Hoffman Nov 01 '21 at 21:08
  • @DarrelHoffman there's sufficient explanation in this answer for anyone to try it. Go for it! – uhoh Nov 01 '21 at 22:24
  • @DarrelHoffman oh indeed you did and I completely missed it, my bad. – uhoh Nov 02 '21 at 14:30
  • Your answer says that the apparent magnitude of Neptune as seen from Uranus is +5.3. Wikipedia’s article about apparent magnitude says that Uranus apparent magnitude is +5.38 as seen from earth. Neptune is a lot closer to Uranus than what Uranus is to earth. There is a mismatch between your answer and the Wikipedia article. – Constantthin Nov 04 '21 at 12:18
  • https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_magnitude – Constantthin Nov 04 '21 at 12:20
  • 2
    @Constantthin Uranus and Neptune are different planets with different sizes and different albedos so you can't make an argument like that without taking those factors into account. – uhoh Nov 04 '21 at 17:03
  • 2
    @uhoh. I beg to disagree. The absolute magnitudes and the sizes of the two planets are almost identical. Uranus' absolute magnitude is -7.11 and Neptune's is -7.00. And Uranus' radius is 25362 km and Neptune's is 24622 km. Thus, almost identical. – Constantthin Nov 04 '21 at 19:04
  • @Constantthin okay you're starting to pique my interest! But rather than a series of one-on-one comments here, I recommend that you ask this as a new question and include that bit of information that you knew and I didn't. My answer here simply provides a window on NASA/JPL's best efforts. I can't speak for what's written in Wikipedia, it cites sources (currently references #30 and #40) and you can mention those in your new question as well. Asking as a new question raises the visibility to the entire community (not just me) maximizing the chance that you'll get a satisfying answer. – uhoh Nov 04 '21 at 19:10
  • @Constantthin: Keep in mind that Neptune can be much further away from Uranus as it can be from the Earth, so having an apparent magnitude (on average) barely brighter than it has on the Earth is definitely possible. – Pierre Paquette Nov 10 '21 at 00:53
9

The brightness of a Solar System object, seen in reflected light, depends on how far it is from the Sun, $d_s$, and how far away it is from the observer, $d_o$, (and the angles between them). Both dependencies are "inverse square laws": $${\rm brightness} \propto \left(\frac{1}{d_s^2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{d_o^2}\right)\ . $$

Both Uranus and Neptune are of similar size and albedo and so would be of similar brightness when viewed from the same distance if they were also the same distance from the Sun.

For example, if we scale the brightness from a hypothetical (and impossible) situation where both are viewed at opposition from 1 au and they were 1 au from the Sun, they would both have an apparent magnitude of about $-7$ (according to the Wikipedia article on absolute magnitude).

Assuming Uranus is 18.3 au from the Sun and 17.3 au from the Earth, then the maximum brightness of Uranus seen from the Earth is therefore fainter than that by approximately $-2.5\log_{10}[(1/18.3)^2(1/17.3)^2] = 5\log_{10}[(18.3)(17.3)]=+12.5$ mag.

If Neptune, at 30 au from the Sun and about 11 au from Uranus, were viewed from Uranus at opposition, it would be fainter by roughly $-2.5\log_{10}[(1/30)^2(1/11)^2]= 5\log_{10}[(30)(11)]=+12.6$ mag.

i.e. At its most favourable, the brightness of Neptune seen from Uranus is almost the same as Uranus as seen from the Earth.

ProfRob
  • 151,483
  • 9
  • 359
  • 566
  • To get to Uranus' apparent magnitude of 5.38 I suppose that you add 12.7 to -7? – Constantthin Nov 08 '21 at 09:14
  • @Constantthin roughly, that is how it would work - I haven't got the distances exactly right - perihelion for Uranus is actually 18.3 au - but the mean apparent mag of Uranus is 5.7. – ProfRob Nov 08 '21 at 09:20
  • @Constantthin I assumed a basic familiarity with the magnitude system. – ProfRob Nov 08 '21 at 12:51
  • Thx. Plugged in 5log(30x11) just now, which gave me = 12.6. It sure is an easier calculation! Which Pierre also seems to have pointed out in his answer. – Constantthin Nov 09 '21 at 23:56
-2

If I have calculated it right then the apparent magnitude of Neptune as seen from Uranus is approximately 4.

  1. The absolute magnitudes of Neptune (-7.11) and Uranus (-7.00) are nearly identical.
  2. The apparent magnitude of Uranus is 5.38.
  3. The distance between Neptune and Uranus is roughly half of the distance between Earth and Uranus.
  4. At half the distance a celestial body becomes four times brighter, which gets converted to a difference of only 1.59 on the logarithmic apparent magnitude scale. (4/2.51=1.59)
  5. 1.59 gets deducted from 5.38 and equals 3.79.
  6. The difference in absolute magnitude of 0.04 (0.11/3) is added on, which changes the figure to 3.83.
  7. Also; adjusting the minor distance discrepancy brings the apparent magnitude of Neptune as seen from Uranus up to a figure of about 4.

An apparent magnitude of 4 is, according to Wikipedia, similar to the apparent magnitudes of the "faintest stars visible in an urban neighborhood with naked eye".

Constantthin
  • 575
  • 5
  • 18
  • The absolute magnitude of an object here, is I suppose how bright it would be at 1 au from the Sun and the observer. The brightness of an object seen in reflected light depends on both. You cannot use this absolute magnitude in the way you have done. – ProfRob Nov 08 '21 at 07:18
  • My version of apparent magnitudes applies apparently only to celestial objects. I just can't understand why two different methods is used; one for celestial objects and one for astronomical objects. – Constantthin Nov 08 '21 at 09:01
  • (a) because Solar System bodies don't intrinsically emit visible light, (b) the apparent magnitude at 10pc would be ridiculously large. – ProfRob Nov 08 '21 at 09:05
  • So, does my point 4 apply at all? – Constantthin Nov 08 '21 at 09:07
  • It does, but not in the way you have applied it. I have supplied an answer. – ProfRob Nov 08 '21 at 09:09
  • You neglect here the varying distance between Uranus and Neptune. They are not always at “only” ~10 astronomical units from each other! Sometimes, Uranus is on one side of its orbit and Neptune on the other side, so the distance between them is then ~70 astronomical units! It makes either planet look very faint from the other one… – Pierre Paquette Nov 10 '21 at 00:55