35

I am finishing writing my master's thesis (~100 pages) and I also just submitted a paper (8 pages) to a conference. Since both are on the same subject and I am an author on both, is it ok if I reuse one page from the paper and put it in my thesis without many changes? The paper will not be published until 2013 (if at all). Is it necessary to cite it in any way?

jakebeal
  • 187,714
  • 41
  • 655
  • 920
Dmitry Chornyi
  • 835
  • 2
  • 8
  • 11

4 Answers4

33

Yes. It is certainly okay. Indeed, general practice when writing a PhD thesis is to produce a number of publications that add up to the thesis, whether directly (using staples) or by a good deal of massage. Some published material may be omitted and some additional material may be included. There's no reason why this shouldn't apply to a Master's thesis, too.

It is a good idea to cite the paper in the thesis (if the paper has been accepted for publication) and the thesis in the paper, if possible.

Dave Clarke
  • 31,848
  • 1
  • 105
  • 144
  • 8
    The recommended method for writing a Master's thesis in my department is to write a journal paper, slap the thesis boilerplate onto it, and add citations in both directions. – JeffE Jun 05 '12 at 14:18
  • @JeffE: Does the journal paper need to be published? – Dave Clarke Jun 05 '12 at 14:24
  • 1
    No, although it certainly makes life easier if it is. And even when the thesis work is published, it's often published only as a proceedings paper, with several details omitted; those missing details still appear in the thesis. – JeffE Jun 06 '12 at 02:11
  • 1
    (-1) for the moment: We cannot be certain that it is OK as we don't know the examination regulations of the OP. It is common, yes, but it is not allowed everywhere. – cbeleites unhappy with SX Jun 07 '12 at 20:18
  • "citations in both directions" - it's circular reference and circular referencing will count the same as plagiarism in similarity analysis although not punished the same way. you should reference the former from the latter. – Erkin Alp Güney Mar 13 '17 at 17:52
7

Yes, this is very common. Indeed, theses are often verbatim copies of one or more published or submitted papers.

I would say you should cite the conference paper, listing it as "Submitted". You should also check with your university's thesis guidelines. It is very likely they will tell you how to cite work that is/will be published elsewhere.

Nate Eldredge
  • 133,015
  • 44
  • 379
  • 480
3

While reusing material is typically done there are three concerns.

The first is citation. If it is in press or published at the time you submit the thesis, I would cite it. I wouldn't bother citing manuscripts that are in preparation/under review/in revision.

The second issue is copyright. Many journals and some universities require you to give up copyright control. Most make concessions, especially for articles, less so for book projects. You need to check and read the rules.

The third is being scoop. Putting your stuff in the public domain is important, but it also puts you are risk. Someone might independently build on your research publish your second chapter before you or conduct follow up research which reveals a huge hole in your research.

StrongBad
  • 104,237
  • 30
  • 262
  • 484
  • 2
    I have never heard of a university demanding the copyright to a student's thesis. Do you have an example? – JeffE Jun 05 '12 at 14:19
  • 2
    @JeffE http://web.mit.edu/faculty/governance/rules/2.70.html – StrongBad Jun 05 '12 at 14:31
  • 1
    Daniel, the rules you quote basically state that the only circumstances which the Institute will retain copyright privileges are ones where the student's research has been financially backed by the Institute, or where the student's research has taken place on equipment or facilities "under conditions that impose copyright restrictions." It hardly says that it is a requirement for the student to give up copyright control. – NominSim Jun 05 '12 at 19:06
  • 1
    @NominSim: But "financially backed" appears to potentially include every case when the student is paid by the Institute, e.g. as a TA or research assistant, or by a graduate fellowship. In some fields this would include almost every student. I am skeptical that this is regularly enforced, though. – Nate Eldredge Jun 05 '12 at 20:17
  • @NateEldredge I agree, though in these cases one would almost expect the Institute to maintain copyright privileges, if they paid for it they should get some say in how it is distributed etc. I was just pointing out that the Institute in no way requires the student to give up copyright control (you can refuse their funding at the very least). – NominSim Jun 05 '12 at 20:19
  • 1
    @NominSim: Regardless of what one might expect, in my experience this is not the way things are actually done. Perhaps this would be fodder for a new question. Also, saying that in such a case the Institute is not "requiring" the student to give up copyright control is like saying a robber who demands "your money or your life" is not requiring you to give up your money. – Nate Eldredge Jun 05 '12 at 20:46
  • @NateEldredge I hardly think the student either accepting financial backing for his research from an accredited University and giving up certain copyright control or not accepting financial backing and maintaining copyright control is akin to a robber demanding "your money or your life". – NominSim Jun 05 '12 at 21:00
  • @NominSim: My point is that requiring copyright control as a condition of funding is, in the majority of cases, de facto the same as requiring it as a condition of enrollment. Anyway, there is a related question here. – Nate Eldredge Jun 05 '12 at 21:17
  • 1
    @NateEldredge I don't know what institution you have been enrolled at, but I do most of the fund providing to the institution by way of tuition, generally not the other way around. – NominSim Jun 05 '12 at 21:21
  • 1
    @NominSim: In practice, graduate students (at least in engineering in the US) do not pay tuition. – JeffE Jun 06 '12 at 02:14
  • @NateEldredge A quick look at PhD theses (http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582) shows that it is not as pervasive as I thought it was, but that it does happen regularly. A further look on the web makes me think that MIT is an outlier in this respect. – StrongBad Jun 06 '12 at 08:21
3

While many universities accept sandwitch theses, the only thing that can give you the right answer are the examination regulations you're subject to.

  • There are cases when parts of thesis work are not allowed to be published (in an article) though that can also create difficulties with the regulations.

  • Usually the university will want to get a paper out of the work in addition to the thesis. So the content being published is usually seen positive.

  • However, they may still not accept verbatim copy of large parts of the text but expect you to rewrite it so that your thesis is one "unbroken" piece of text written by you yourself.

cbeleites unhappy with SX
  • 23,007
  • 1
  • 44
  • 91